Welcoming Remarks

Robert Hauser, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education

Susan Winter, National Science Foundation, Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences

Daniel Ilgen, Michigan State University (Meeting Chair)

Overview of the Science of Team Science

Stephen M. Fiore, University of Central Florida
Questions and discussion

Emerging Challenges of Team Science (Panel Discussion)

Scientist perspectives

Hannah Valantine, Stanford Medical School

Lynn Riddiford, Janelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute

Funder perspectives

Robert Croyle, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Control and Population Studies

Wanda Ward, National Science Foundation Office of Integrative Activities

Needs and Challenges in the Field

Kara Hall, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Control and Population Studies

Questions and discussion

Working Lunch with Keynote Address

How to make it work in real time and in real life: building interdisciplinary programs

Michael M. Crow, Arizona State University

Questions and discussion

Emerging Insights from the Science of Team Science

Examples of research that aids in understanding and addressing the challenges

Daniel Stokols, University of California, Irvine
- Methods and tools for strategic team science

Jonathon Cummings, Duke University
- The influence of group size and heterogeneity on the productivity of research teams

Response: Alternative team science infrastructures

James Jackson, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan
Anne Heberger Marino, the National Academies Keck Futures Initiative
Jeremy Sabloff, Santa Fe Institute

Questions and discussion

Goals of the National Research Council Study

Nancy Cooke, Arizona State University (Study Committee Chair)

Questions and discussion

Final Reflections

Daniel Ilgen, Michigan State University

- Where are we now?
- What should the study committee keep in mind as it moves forward?
- Who are the key audiences for the report?
- How might the conclusions and recommendations best be framed to address the needs of the field?
- General discussion